← All case studies
CASE STUDIES · 2025

ZybraMoney

Weekly release gates held through a mid-flight FinTech rebuild. Hundreds of defects closed.

ZybraMoney is an Africa-focused FinTech backend handling group savings (ROSCA flows), wallet-linked journeys, payments, transfers, referrals, and the security and compliance controls financial workflows demand.

BLOCKCHAIN 2025 Live
01 Overview

Overview

ZybraMoney is an Africa-focused FinTech backend handling group savings (ROSCA flows), wallet-linked journeys, payments, transfers, referrals, and the security and compliance controls financial workflows demand.

02 What's the challenge?

What's the challenge?

We joined mid-modernization. Architecture in flux. Service boundaries getting redrawn. Defect density high. Security and functional issues bleeding into each other across auth, session, and transaction surfaces. QA held release safety weekly while engineering rebuilt the foundations underneath.

03 What call did we make?

The cleanup nobody priced into the rebuild.

Live with real users when we joined. A junior had vibe-coded it in a hurry, and support was paying for it, daily tickets, the same defects resurfacing, trust eroding in a system that moves money. We didn't restart it. We worked the failure surface week by week, tying every closure to the release gate. Months in, support requests dropped to near zero.
04 What We Did

What We Did

Money-moving system, foundations being rebuilt underneath. We tied defect closure to the weekly release gate, not to ticket count, a ‘closed’ bug had to be genuinely closed. Full defect lifecycle ownership: reproduction, triage, fix verification, regression follow-up. Security-remediation validation across auth, session, and transaction surfaces. Cross-team supervision over distributed contributors. Architecture moved weekly. Regressions never compounded.

05 Outcomes

Outcomes

Risk Weekly Release Gates Held
Risk Hundreds Defects Closed
Business ~0 Support Tickets After Cleanup
Selected Screens
06 What We Learned

What We Learned

Refactor-heavy environments need QA as continuous signal, not a checkpoint. Tying closure quality to weekly release gates kept regressions from compounding while architecture moved. The discipline isn’t in the tools, it’s in the closure criteria.

Tech Stack
Tags
FinTechQAAfrica

Want outcomes like this?

Tell us what you're building. We'll tell you whether we're the right team for it.

 Book a call